Article Review Gill, Valerie Essay

In the bind Catharine Beecher and Charlotte Perkins Gilman Architects of Female Power by author Valerie Gill, Ms. Gill searchs to bridge the gap between what appears to be ii powerful wo men of their time with dickens totally different opinions of the American muliebrity and the type of life they should lead. The author points come out the obvious distinctions of opinions in the literature of the two women, who are related by the way, and the different era in which they write.Catharine Beecher was the great aunt of Charlotte Perkins Gilman and lived and wrote during a time when a muliebrity running(a) in any other place besides the home was not more or lessthing that happened often. A womans job during this time was to raise children and absorb the home a warm, inviting space that had functionality that would allow for separate spheres for the men and women, allowing the men to have a place to discuss outside ventures and women to have a place to deal with domestic ma tters.Charlotte Perkins Gilman on the other hand, lived during a current where productivity was happening in factories all over the country. Her feminist attempt to undo her great aunts motif that women should be appoint to only the home made it appear that the two women had absolutely nix in coarse when it came to the ideas on how women should be viewed socially. Gill points out how the two very different opinions actually have many things in common. some(prenominal) women agree that the role of women is very grand to the health of society, even though they disagree on what their roles should be. By suggesting that each writer knows what is the best arrangement for women to experience shows another similarity between the two writers.As pointed out by Gill, Both writers conceptualize the identity of women in spatial as well as socioeconomic terms, assuming that the fulfillment of their own enkindle can be quite literally mapped out. The author makes a point that even though their opinions of what is ideal are very different, the idea that there is one way to make women live a rise life is exactly the same. Both women also had the common conclusion that the womans place, whether it is in the home working or in the milling machinery working, would make a great impact on the society.Architectural ideas as to better society are another thing these two authors had in common, as pointed out by Gill in the member. The elder author Beecher would make drawings in her articles about staging the home and using dividers as a way to make more areas in the home, and Gilman, being implicated about the lives led by farmers wives, included drawings of a farming residential area shaped like a pie that had common areas to share, as to make life easier for them.Interesting enough, Gill included in her article a picture of a drawing done by Beecher, along with her sister Harriet Beecher Stowe, later in life of a turn back of houses with common areas used  to house the homeless, helpless, and vicious which very much resembled Gilmans block community idea where people shared common spaces and so that some women could take care of the children and household duties while others went out in the community to work.This is an excellent example of Beecher have in minding like Gilman in the mixing of common and private space. It is my opinion that the aging Beecher was beginning to think out of the box. This article was insightful and gave a great example of how people with a difference of opinion can actually be thinking the same.If one only prove the two womens writings without an open mind, one would think they were completely different and had totally different ideas. Valerie Gill allowed the reader of the article to view a situation such as this one in a different way and to keep an open mind and read between the lines of any writings. I would have liked to have seen her go on and discuss the idea that some women may belong at ho me and some may belong in the workforce. I moot that every woman has a different situation to consider and what is important to one woman may not be important to another.